Elbit Systems Ltd. or Curtiss-Wright Corporation: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: Curtiss-Wright vs. Elbit Systems

__timestampCurtiss-Wright CorporationElbit Systems Ltd.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014426301000356171000
Thursday, January 1, 2015411801000385059000
Friday, January 1, 2016383793000422390000
Sunday, January 1, 2017418544000413560000
Monday, January 1, 2018433110000441362000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019422272000516149000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020412825000514638000
Friday, January 1, 2021443096000559113000
Saturday, January 1, 2022445679000639067000
Sunday, January 1, 2023496812000696022000
Monday, January 1, 2024518857000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Managing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of defense and aerospace, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Elbit Systems Ltd. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to handling these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Curtiss-Wright's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 17%, while Elbit Systems saw a staggering 95% increase. This significant difference highlights Elbit's aggressive expansion strategy, possibly investing more in marketing and administrative capabilities. In contrast, Curtiss-Wright's more conservative growth suggests a focus on efficiency and cost control. As of 2023, Elbit's SG&A expenses are nearly 40% higher than Curtiss-Wright's, reflecting their divergent paths. Investors and industry analysts should consider these trends when evaluating the financial health and strategic direction of these companies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025