Fastenal Company or AECOM: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: AECOM vs. Fastenal

__timestampAECOMFastenal Company
Wednesday, January 1, 2014809080001110776000
Thursday, January 1, 20151139750001121590000
Friday, January 1, 20161150880001169470000
Sunday, January 1, 20171333090001282800000
Monday, January 1, 20181357870001400200000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191481230001459400000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201885350001427400000
Friday, January 1, 20211550720001559800000
Saturday, January 1, 20221473090001762200000
Sunday, January 1, 20231535750001825800000
Monday, January 1, 20241601050001891900000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Managing SG&A Costs: AECOM vs. Fastenal Company

In the competitive landscape of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. AECOM and Fastenal Company, two industry giants, have shown distinct approaches over the past decade. From 2014 to 2024, Fastenal consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking at nearly $1.9 billion in 2024, a 70% increase from 2014. In contrast, AECOM's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 98% over the same period, reaching $160 million in 2024. This trend suggests Fastenal's larger scale of operations, while AECOM's sharper increase indicates strategic investments or operational expansions. Understanding these dynamics offers valuable insights into each company's financial strategies and market positioning. As businesses navigate economic challenges, effective SG&A management remains a key differentiator in sustaining growth and competitiveness.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025