Fastenal Company or C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Fastenal vs. C.H. Robinson: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampC.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.Fastenal Company
Wednesday, January 1, 20143202130001110776000
Thursday, January 1, 20153587600001121590000
Friday, January 1, 20163750610001169470000
Sunday, January 1, 20174134040001282800000
Monday, January 1, 20184496100001400200000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194978060001459400000
Wednesday, January 1, 20204961220001427400000
Friday, January 1, 20215263710001559800000
Saturday, January 1, 20226034150001762200000
Sunday, January 1, 20236242660001825800000
Monday, January 1, 20246396240001891900000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: Fastenal or C.H. Robinson?

In the competitive landscape of corporate America, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Fastenal Company and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. have been at the forefront of this financial balancing act since 2014. Over the past decade, Fastenal has consistently outpaced C.H. Robinson in SG&A efficiency. Fastenal's SG&A expenses have grown by approximately 71% from 2014 to 2024, while C.H. Robinson's expenses have surged by nearly 100% in the same period. This indicates Fastenal's superior cost management strategy, maintaining a steadier growth trajectory. As businesses navigate economic uncertainties, understanding these trends offers valuable insights into strategic financial management. Fastenal's approach could serve as a model for companies aiming to optimize their SG&A expenses while sustaining growth.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025