Gilead Sciences, Inc. vs Dyne Therapeutics, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored

Cost Efficiency Showdown: Gilead vs. Dyne

__timestampDyne Therapeutics, Inc.Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201411450000003788000000
Thursday, January 1, 201520280000004006000000
Friday, January 1, 201622810000004261000000
Sunday, January 1, 201729320000004371000000
Monday, January 1, 2018240004853000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192710004675000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20207000004572000000
Friday, January 1, 202110880006601000000
Saturday, January 1, 202233450005657000000
Sunday, January 1, 202324610006498000000
Monday, January 1, 202428675800000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Exploring Cost Efficiency: Gilead Sciences vs. Dyne Therapeutics

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical landscape, cost efficiency is a critical metric for success. This analysis delves into the cost of revenue trends for Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Dyne Therapeutics, Inc. from 2014 to 2023. Gilead Sciences consistently demonstrates robust cost management, with an average cost of revenue around $4.9 billion annually. Notably, in 2021, Gilead's cost of revenue peaked at approximately $6.6 billion, reflecting a strategic expansion.

Conversely, Dyne Therapeutics, a newer player, shows a more volatile pattern. From a high of $2.9 billion in 2017, Dyne's cost of revenue plummeted to a mere $24,000 in 2018, indicating a significant operational shift. By 2023, Dyne's costs stabilized around $2.5 million, suggesting a recalibrated approach. This comparative analysis underscores the diverse strategies employed by established and emerging biotech firms in managing operational costs.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025