Gross Profit Analysis: Comparing Lam Research Corporation and Pure Storage, Inc.

Tech Giants' Profit Growth: Lam vs. Pure Storage

__timestampLam Research CorporationPure Storage, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014200748100018604000
Thursday, January 1, 2015228433600096899000
Friday, January 1, 20162618922000272440000
Sunday, January 1, 20173603359000475698000
Monday, January 1, 20185165032000669238000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194358459000902296000
Wednesday, January 1, 202046086930001133554000
Friday, January 1, 202168053060001148924000
Saturday, January 1, 202278718070001472519000
Sunday, January 1, 202377769250001897646000
Monday, January 1, 202470527910002021191000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Gross Profit Trends: Lam Research vs. Pure Storage

In the ever-evolving tech industry, understanding financial performance is crucial. This analysis compares the gross profit trends of Lam Research Corporation and Pure Storage, Inc. from 2014 to 2024. Lam Research, a leader in semiconductor manufacturing, has shown a robust growth trajectory, with its gross profit increasing by nearly 250% over the decade. In contrast, Pure Storage, a pioneer in data storage solutions, has experienced a staggering growth of over 10,000%, reflecting its rapid market penetration and expansion.

Key Insights

  • Lam Research: Peaked in 2022 with a gross profit of approximately $7.9 billion, showcasing its resilience and market dominance.
  • Pure Storage: Despite starting with a modest $18.6 million in 2014, it reached over $2 billion by 2024, highlighting its aggressive growth strategy.

These trends underscore the dynamic nature of the tech sector, where innovation and strategic positioning drive financial success.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025