GSK plc or Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.: Who Invests More in Innovation?

GSK's R&D spending dwarfs Halozyme's over the past decade.

__timestampGSK plcHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014345000000079696000
Thursday, January 1, 2015356000000093236000
Friday, January 1, 20163628000000150842000
Sunday, January 1, 20174476000000150643000
Monday, January 1, 20183893000000150252000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194568000000140804000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020509800000034236000
Friday, January 1, 2021527800000035672000
Saturday, January 1, 2022548800000066607000
Sunday, January 1, 2023622300000076363000
Monday, January 1, 202479048000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Innovation Investment: GSK vs. Halozyme

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical landscape, investment in research and development (R&D) is a key indicator of a company's commitment to innovation. Over the past decade, GSK plc has consistently outpaced Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. in R&D spending. From 2014 to 2023, GSK's R&D expenses surged by approximately 80%, peaking at $6.2 billion in 2023. In contrast, Halozyme's investment remained relatively modest, with a peak of $150 million in 2016, and a notable dip to $34 million in 2020. This disparity highlights GSK's robust strategy to maintain its competitive edge through innovation. As the pharmaceutical industry faces increasing challenges, such as regulatory changes and market competition, GSK's substantial R&D investment underscores its commitment to pioneering new treatments and therapies. Meanwhile, Halozyme's more conservative approach may reflect a strategic focus on niche markets or partnerships.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025