ImmunityBio, Inc. and Wave Life Sciences Ltd.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

Biotech Giants' SG&A Spending: A Decade of Divergence

__timestampImmunityBio, Inc.Wave Life Sciences Ltd.
Wednesday, January 1, 201443260002999000
Thursday, January 1, 201522620600010393000
Friday, January 1, 20169439100015994000
Sunday, January 1, 20175382100026975000
Monday, January 1, 20183546300039509000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194645600048869000
Wednesday, January 1, 20207131800042510000
Friday, January 1, 202113525600046105000
Saturday, January 1, 202210270800050513000
Sunday, January 1, 202312962000051292000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

SG&A Spending Patterns: ImmunityBio vs. Wave Life Sciences

In the ever-evolving landscape of biotechnology, understanding the financial strategies of key players is crucial. ImmunityBio, Inc. and Wave Life Sciences Ltd. have shown distinct patterns in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, ImmunityBio's SG&A expenses surged by approximately 2,900%, peaking in 2015 with a notable spike. This reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities. In contrast, Wave Life Sciences exhibited a steadier growth, with a 1,600% increase over the same period, indicating a more measured approach to scaling operations. By 2023, ImmunityBio's SG&A expenses were nearly 2.5 times higher than Wave Life Sciences, highlighting their divergent strategies in managing operational costs. This comparison offers a window into how these companies prioritize spending to fuel innovation and growth in the competitive biotech sector.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025