__timestamp | Clean Harbors, Inc. | Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 2441796000 | 10621373000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 2356806000 | 10146494000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1932857000 | 9196326000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 2062673000 | 8250536000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 2305551000 | 12156276000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 2387819000 | 10260840000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 2137751000 | 10980307000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 2609837000 | 11048860000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 3543930000 | 11595785000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 3746124000 | 12879099000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 4065713000 | 8668185000 |
Unleashing insights
In the competitive landscape of engineering and environmental services, cost efficiency is a critical metric. Over the past decade, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and Clean Harbors, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting trends in their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2023, Jacobs Engineering consistently maintained a higher cost of revenue, peaking at approximately $12.9 billion in 2023, reflecting its expansive operations. In contrast, Clean Harbors, Inc. showed a steady increase, reaching around $3.7 billion in the same year, marking a 54% rise from 2014. This divergence highlights Jacobs' larger scale and Clean Harbors' growth trajectory. Notably, 2024 data for Clean Harbors is missing, indicating potential reporting delays or strategic shifts. Understanding these trends offers valuable insights into each company's operational strategies and market positioning.
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. vs C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. vs Curtiss-Wright Corporation
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and Nordson Corporation's Expenses
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and ITT Inc.