Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc or Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: Jazz vs. Taro

__timestampJazz Pharmaceuticals plcTaro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
Wednesday, January 1, 201440611400091733000
Thursday, January 1, 201544911900087644000
Friday, January 1, 201650289200092365000
Sunday, January 1, 201754415600085656000
Monday, January 1, 201868353000088196000
Tuesday, January 1, 201973694200089971000
Wednesday, January 1, 202085423300093413000
Friday, January 1, 2021145168300091355000
Saturday, January 1, 20221416967000113676000
Sunday, January 1, 20231343105000198366000
Monday, January 1, 2024218935000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

SG&A Cost Management: A Tale of Two Pharmaceutical Giants

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc and Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. have taken different paths in this regard. From 2014 to 2023, Jazz Pharmaceuticals saw a staggering 230% increase in SG&A expenses, peaking in 2021. In contrast, Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. maintained a more stable trajectory, with expenses growing by approximately 140% over the same period.

Jazz Pharmaceuticals' expenses surged notably in 2021, reaching their highest point, while Taro's costs remained relatively consistent, with a slight uptick in 2023. This suggests that Taro has been more effective in controlling its SG&A costs, despite Jazz's larger scale. The data highlights the importance of strategic cost management in sustaining competitive advantage in the pharmaceutical industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025