Johnson & Johnson and GSK plc: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

Comparing SG&A strategies of pharma giants over a decade.

__timestampGSK plcJohnson & Johnson
Wednesday, January 1, 2014824600000021954000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015923200000021203000000
Friday, January 1, 2016936600000019945000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017967200000021420000000
Monday, January 1, 2018991500000022540000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191140200000022178000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201145600000022084000000
Friday, January 1, 20211097500000020118000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022837200000019046000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023938500000020112000000
Monday, January 1, 202421969000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

SG&A Spending Patterns: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical industry, understanding the financial strategies of leading companies is crucial. Johnson & Johnson and GSK plc, two titans in the field, have demonstrated distinct approaches to their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses over the past decade.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

From 2014 to 2023, Johnson & Johnson consistently allocated a higher percentage of their revenue to SG&A expenses compared to GSK. In 2014, Johnson & Johnson's SG&A spending was approximately 2.7 times that of GSK. However, by 2023, this ratio had slightly decreased, reflecting a more conservative approach.

Trends and Insights

While GSK's SG&A expenses peaked in 2020, Johnson & Johnson's highest expenditure was in 2018. Notably, both companies experienced a dip in 2022, with GSK's expenses dropping by 27% from their 2020 peak. This trend highlights the dynamic nature of financial strategies in response to global economic shifts.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025