Johnson & Johnson or Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: Stability vs. Growth

__timestampAmicus Therapeutics, Inc.Johnson & Johnson
Wednesday, January 1, 20142071700021954000000
Thursday, January 1, 20154726900021203000000
Friday, January 1, 20167115100019945000000
Sunday, January 1, 20178867100021420000000
Monday, January 1, 201812720000022540000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201916986100022178000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202015640700022084000000
Friday, January 1, 202119271000020118000000
Saturday, January 1, 202221304100019046000000
Sunday, January 1, 202327527000020112000000
Monday, January 1, 202421969000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Managing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Johnson & Johnson, a global healthcare giant, and Amicus Therapeutics, a smaller biotech firm, offer a fascinating contrast in SG&A management from 2014 to 2023.

Johnson & Johnson: A Steady Hand

Over the past decade, Johnson & Johnson has maintained a relatively stable SG&A expense, averaging around $21 billion annually. Despite fluctuations, their expenses have shown a slight downward trend, indicating efficient cost management strategies.

Amicus Therapeutics: Rapid Growth

Conversely, Amicus Therapeutics has seen a dramatic increase in SG&A expenses, growing by over 1,200% from 2014 to 2023. This surge reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in growth.

In conclusion, while Johnson & Johnson exemplifies stability, Amicus Therapeutics showcases dynamic growth, each with its own strategic approach to SG&A management.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025