Johnson & Johnson or Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: J&J vs. Sarepta

__timestampJohnson & JohnsonSarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20142195400000049315000
Thursday, January 1, 20152120300000075043000
Friday, January 1, 20161994500000083749000
Sunday, January 1, 201721420000000122682000
Monday, January 1, 201822540000000207761000
Tuesday, January 1, 201922178000000284812000
Wednesday, January 1, 202022084000000317875000
Friday, January 1, 202120118000000282660000
Saturday, January 1, 202219046000000451421000
Sunday, January 1, 202320112000000481871000
Monday, January 1, 202421969000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

SG&A Cost Management: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Johnson & Johnson, a stalwart in the sector, has consistently maintained SG&A expenses around $21 billion annually over the past decade. In contrast, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc., a smaller player, has seen its SG&A costs rise from approximately $49 million in 2014 to nearly $482 million in 2023, marking a staggering increase of over 880%.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

While Johnson & Johnson's SG&A expenses have shown a slight downward trend, decreasing by about 9% from 2014 to 2023, Sarepta's expenses have surged, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy. This comparison highlights the different financial strategies employed by established giants and emerging innovators in the industry. Understanding these dynamics is essential for investors and stakeholders aiming to navigate the complexities of the pharmaceutical market.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025