Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. or Celldex Therapeutics, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Biotech Giants: A Decade of SG&A Cost Strategies

__timestampCelldex Therapeutics, Inc.Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20142062200015746000
Thursday, January 1, 20153383700013392000
Friday, January 1, 2016359790009290000
Sunday, January 1, 2017250030007672000
Monday, January 1, 20181926900015293000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191542600022648000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201445600021864000
Friday, January 1, 20212048800037318000
Saturday, January 1, 20222719500048130000
Sunday, January 1, 202330914000108146000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

SG&A Cost Management: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for sustaining growth and innovation. Over the past decade, Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. and Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A cost management.

From 2014 to 2023, Celldex's SG&A expenses fluctuated, peaking in 2016 with a 36% increase from 2014, before stabilizing around $20 million in recent years. In contrast, Madrigal's SG&A costs surged dramatically, especially between 2021 and 2023, where they more than doubled, reaching over $108 million.

This stark difference highlights Madrigal's aggressive investment in administrative functions, possibly reflecting strategic expansions or increased operational activities. Meanwhile, Celldex's steadier approach suggests a focus on maintaining operational efficiency. As these companies continue to evolve, their SG&A strategies will be pivotal in shaping their financial health and competitive edge.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025