Masco Corporation vs Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored

Cost Efficiency: Masco vs Booz Allen Hamilton

__timestampBooz Allen Hamilton Holding CorporationMasco Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201427161130006134000000
Thursday, January 1, 201525938490004889000000
Friday, January 1, 201625800260004901000000
Sunday, January 1, 201726919820005033000000
Monday, January 1, 201828671030005670000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201931004660004336000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202033791800004601000000
Friday, January 1, 202136575300005512000000
Saturday, January 1, 202238996220005967000000
Sunday, January 1, 202343048100005131000000
Monday, January 1, 202482028470004997000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Exploring Cost Efficiency: Masco Corporation vs Booz Allen Hamilton

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding cost efficiency is paramount. This analysis delves into the cost of revenue trends for Masco Corporation and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation from 2014 to 2023. Over this decade, Masco Corporation consistently maintained a higher cost of revenue, peaking in 2014 with a 6.1 billion USD expenditure. In contrast, Booz Allen Hamilton's cost of revenue showed a steady increase, culminating in a significant spike in 2024, reaching 8.2 billion USD.

Interestingly, while Masco's cost of revenue fluctuated, it remained relatively stable, averaging around 5.2 billion USD. Booz Allen Hamilton, however, demonstrated a more dynamic growth, with a notable 60% increase from 2014 to 2023. This data highlights the contrasting strategies and market conditions faced by these industry giants, offering valuable insights into their operational efficiencies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025