Micron Technology, Inc. or MicroStrategy Incorporated: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Micron vs. MicroStrategy: A Decade of SG&A Cost Management

__timestampMicroStrategy IncorporatedMicron Technology, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014321429000707000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015229254000719000000
Friday, January 1, 2016238202000659000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017254773000743000000
Monday, January 1, 2018291659000813000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019277932000836000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020229046000881000000
Friday, January 1, 2021255642000894000000
Saturday, January 1, 20222583030001066000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023264983000920000000
Monday, January 1, 20242786180001129000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: Micron Technology or MicroStrategy?

In the competitive landscape of technology giants, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Micron Technology, Inc. and MicroStrategy Incorporated have shown distinct approaches to handling these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Micron consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $1.13 billion in 2024, while MicroStrategy's expenses remained relatively stable, averaging around $262 million annually.

Despite Micron's larger scale, its SG&A expenses grew by about 60% over the period, compared to MicroStrategy's modest 15% increase. This suggests that MicroStrategy may have a tighter grip on cost management. However, Micron's higher expenses could be attributed to its expansive operations and growth strategies. As we look to the future, the ability to control these costs will be pivotal in determining which company can sustain its competitive edge.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025