Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of AstraZeneca PLC and United Therapeutics Corporation

SG&A Trends: AstraZeneca vs. United Therapeutics

__timestampAstraZeneca PLCUnited Therapeutics Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201413324000000381287000
Thursday, January 1, 201511451000000452612000
Friday, January 1, 20169739000000316800000
Sunday, January 1, 201710543000000330100000
Monday, January 1, 201810362000000265800000
Tuesday, January 1, 201911848000000336200000
Wednesday, January 1, 202011693000000423900000
Friday, January 1, 202115680000000467000000
Saturday, January 1, 202218955000000487000000
Sunday, January 1, 202318025000000477100000
Monday, January 1, 202420532000000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

A Decade of SG&A: AstraZeneca vs. United Therapeutics

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical industry, operational efficiency is key to maintaining a competitive edge. Over the past decade, AstraZeneca PLC and United Therapeutics Corporation have demonstrated contrasting strategies in managing their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses.

AstraZeneca's Strategic Investments

AstraZeneca has consistently invested in its operational framework, with SG&A expenses peaking at approximately $18 billion in 2022, marking a 42% increase from 2014. This trend reflects AstraZeneca's commitment to expanding its market presence and enhancing its operational capabilities.

United Therapeutics' Lean Approach

Conversely, United Therapeutics has maintained a leaner operational model, with SG&A expenses hovering around $480 million in recent years. This approach underscores the company's focus on cost efficiency and targeted growth.

Conclusion

These divergent strategies highlight the varied paths companies can take to achieve success in the pharmaceutical sector, each with its own set of challenges and opportunities.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025