Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

SG&A Trends: Catalyst vs. Arrowhead Over a Decade

__timestampArrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014244195364473654
Thursday, January 1, 2015347180898597010
Friday, January 1, 2016409982097910260
Sunday, January 1, 2017320228807304399
Monday, January 1, 20181911005115875961
Tuesday, January 1, 20192655625736881187
Wednesday, January 1, 20205227589044233754
Friday, January 1, 20218098100049628000
Saturday, January 1, 202212443100058183000
Sunday, January 1, 202390932000133710000
Monday, January 1, 202498761000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

A Decade of SG&A: Catalyst vs. Arrowhead

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical industry, operational efficiency is key. Over the past decade, Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have showcased distinct trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Arrowhead's SG&A expenses surged by approximately 300%, peaking in 2022. In contrast, Catalyst's expenses saw a dramatic increase of nearly 2,900% by 2023, highlighting a strategic shift in their operational focus.

Key Insights

  • 2014-2018: Arrowhead maintained a steady growth, while Catalyst's expenses remained relatively low.
  • 2019-2023: Catalyst's expenses skyrocketed, surpassing Arrowhead in 2023, indicating aggressive expansion or restructuring.

These trends reflect broader industry dynamics, where companies balance cost management with growth strategies. Missing data for 2024 suggests ongoing developments, making this a space to watch.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025