__timestamp | Deere & Company | Masco Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 3284400000 | 1607000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 2873300000 | 1339000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 2763700000 | 1403000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 3066600000 | 1442000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 3455500000 | 1478000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 3551000000 | 1274000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 3477000000 | 1292000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 3383000000 | 1413000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 3863000000 | 1390000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 3601000000 | 1481000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 4507000000 | 1468000000 |
Cracking the code
In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate America, operational efficiency remains a cornerstone of success. Over the past decade, Deere & Company and Masco Corporation have showcased contrasting trajectories in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. Deere & Company, a titan in the agricultural machinery sector, has seen its SG&A expenses grow by approximately 37% from 2014 to 2024, peaking at an impressive $4.5 billion in 2024. In contrast, Masco Corporation, a leader in home improvement products, maintained a more stable SG&A profile, with expenses fluctuating modestly around $1.4 billion annually. Notably, Masco's data for 2024 remains elusive, leaving room for speculation. This analysis underscores the strategic financial maneuvers of these industry giants, offering a window into their operational priorities and market adaptability.
Deere & Company vs Masco Corporation: Annual Revenue Growth Compared
Deere & Company vs Masco Corporation: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Deere & Company or AerCap Holdings N.V.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Deere & Company or TransUnion
Who Generates Higher Gross Profit? Deere & Company or Masco Corporation
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Deere & Company and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Deere & Company vs Carlisle Companies Incorporated: SG&A Expense Trends
EBITDA Performance Review: Deere & Company vs Masco Corporation
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Deere & Company vs Snap-on Incorporated
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Deere & Company and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.