Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Grifols, S.A. and Mesoblast Limited

SG&A Expenses: Grifols vs. Mesoblast - A Decade of Divergence

__timestampGrifols, S.A.Mesoblast Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 201466077200054170000
Thursday, January 1, 201573643500065378000
Friday, January 1, 201677526600052263000
Sunday, January 1, 201786034800035072000
Monday, January 1, 201881477500027415000
Tuesday, January 1, 201994282100036983000
Wednesday, January 1, 202098561600050918000
Friday, January 1, 2021106150800063586000
Saturday, January 1, 2022119042300057967000
Sunday, January 1, 2023125423400053107000
Monday, January 1, 202423626000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

A Comparative Analysis of SG&A Expenses: Grifols, S.A. vs. Mesoblast Limited

In the ever-evolving landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, operational efficiency is paramount. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two prominent players: Grifols, S.A. and Mesoblast Limited, from 2014 to 2023. Grifols, a Spanish multinational, has consistently demonstrated robust financial management, with its SG&A expenses growing by approximately 90% over the decade. In contrast, Mesoblast, an Australian regenerative medicine company, has maintained a more conservative growth in expenses, peaking in 2015 and then stabilizing. By 2023, Grifols' SG&A expenses were nearly 20 times higher than those of Mesoblast, highlighting the scale and operational breadth of the former. This disparity underscores the strategic differences in their business models, with Grifols focusing on expansive growth and Mesoblast on targeted innovation. Missing data for 2024 suggests a need for updated insights to continue this analysis.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025