Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited and Genmab A/S

Teva vs. Genmab: A Decade of SG&A Trends

__timestampGenmab A/STeva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 2014795290005078000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015912240004717000000
Friday, January 1, 20161024130005096000000
Sunday, January 1, 20171469870004986000000
Monday, January 1, 20182136950004214000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193420000003806000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206610000003671000000
Friday, January 1, 202112830000003528000000
Saturday, January 1, 202226760000003445000000
Sunday, January 1, 202332970000003498000000
Monday, January 1, 202437900000003702000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

A Decade of SG&A: Teva vs. Genmab

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical industry, operational efficiency is key to maintaining a competitive edge. Over the past decade, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited and Genmab A/S have showcased contrasting trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses.

Teva's Steady Decline

Teva, a global leader in generic medicines, has seen a consistent reduction in SG&A expenses, dropping from a peak in 2016 to a 32% decrease by 2023. This trend reflects Teva's strategic cost-cutting measures amidst challenging market conditions.

Genmab's Exponential Growth

Conversely, Genmab, a biotechnology innovator, has experienced a staggering 4,000% increase in SG&A expenses since 2014. This surge aligns with Genmab's aggressive expansion and investment in research and development, positioning itself as a frontrunner in antibody therapeutics.

These divergent paths highlight the distinct strategies of two industry giants, offering valuable insights into their operational priorities and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025