Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. and Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.

SG&A Expenses: Walgreens vs. Taro, A Decade of Insights

__timestampTaro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20149173300017992000000
Thursday, January 1, 20158764400022400000000
Friday, January 1, 20169236500023910000000
Sunday, January 1, 20178565600023813000000
Monday, January 1, 20188819600024694000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20198997100023557000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20209341300025436000000
Friday, January 1, 20219135500024586000000
Saturday, January 1, 202211367600027295000000
Sunday, January 1, 202319836600034205000000
Monday, January 1, 202421893500028113000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

A Comparative Analysis of SG&A Expenses: Walgreens Boots Alliance vs. Taro Pharmaceutical

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical landscape, operational efficiency is paramount. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two industry giants: Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. and Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., from 2014 to 2024. Over this decade, Walgreens consistently outpaced Taro in SG&A spending, with figures peaking at approximately $28 billion in 2024, a 59% increase from 2014. In contrast, Taro's expenses grew by 138%, reaching around $219 million in 2024. This stark difference highlights Walgreens' expansive operational scale compared to Taro's more conservative approach. The data underscores the strategic choices each company makes in managing operational costs, reflecting their market positioning and growth strategies. As the industry faces new challenges, understanding these financial dynamics is crucial for stakeholders and investors alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025