Palo Alto Networks, Inc. or Analog Devices, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Palo Alto vs. Analog: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampAnalog Devices, Inc.Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014454676000407912000
Thursday, January 1, 2015478972000624261000
Friday, January 1, 2016461438000914400000
Sunday, January 1, 20176910460001117400000
Monday, January 1, 20186959370001356200000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196480940001605800000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206599230001819800000
Friday, January 1, 20219154180002144900000
Saturday, January 1, 202212661750002553900000
Sunday, January 1, 202312735840002991700000
Monday, January 1, 202410686400003475000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

SG&A Cost Management: Palo Alto Networks vs. Analog Devices

In the competitive landscape of technology companies, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Analog Devices, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A cost management. From 2014 to 2023, Palo Alto Networks saw a staggering increase in SG&A expenses, rising from approximately $408 million to nearly $3.5 billion, reflecting a growth of over 750%. In contrast, Analog Devices experienced a more modest increase of around 180%, from $455 million to $1.27 billion. This disparity highlights Palo Alto Networks' aggressive expansion strategy, while Analog Devices maintains a more conservative approach. As we look to 2024, the trend continues, with Palo Alto Networks' SG&A expenses projected to surpass $3.5 billion, indicating a continued focus on growth and market penetration.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025