Palo Alto Networks, Inc. or Autodesk, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Tech Giants' SG&A Strategies: Steady vs. Aggressive Growth

__timestampAutodesk, Inc.Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141090900000407912000
Thursday, January 1, 20151281300000624261000
Friday, January 1, 20161308900000914400000
Sunday, January 1, 201713103000001117400000
Monday, January 1, 201813925000001356200000
Tuesday, January 1, 201915240000001605800000
Wednesday, January 1, 202017159000001819800000
Friday, January 1, 202118542000002144900000
Saturday, January 1, 202221948000002553900000
Sunday, January 1, 202322770000002991700000
Monday, January 1, 202424430000003475000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Managing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Tech Giants

In the competitive world of technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Autodesk, Inc. and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. have shown distinct strategies in handling these costs. From 2014 to 2024, Autodesk's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 124%, while Palo Alto Networks saw a staggering increase of around 751%. Despite this, Autodesk maintained a more consistent growth pattern, with expenses rising steadily each year. In contrast, Palo Alto Networks experienced a sharper increase, particularly from 2019 onwards, reflecting its aggressive expansion strategy. By 2024, Palo Alto Networks' SG&A expenses were about 42% higher than Autodesk's. This data highlights the different approaches these companies take in managing operational costs, with Autodesk focusing on steady growth and Palo Alto Networks on rapid expansion.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025