__timestamp | AECOM | Pool Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 417662000 | 204752000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1020478000 | 233610000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 926466000 | 277836000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 920292000 | 310096000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 680801000 | 341804000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 573352000 | 370520000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 580017000 | 493425000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 813356000 | 862810000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 826856000 | 1064808000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 543642000 | 786707000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1082384000 |
In pursuit of knowledge
In the competitive landscape of professional services, AECOM and Pool Corporation have showcased intriguing financial trajectories over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, AECOM's EBITDA has seen fluctuations, peaking in 2024 with a remarkable 160% increase from its 2014 figures. Meanwhile, Pool Corporation has demonstrated a steady climb, achieving its highest EBITDA in 2022, marking a 420% growth since 2014. Notably, 2021 was a pivotal year, with Pool Corporation surpassing AECOM for the first time, highlighting its robust financial strategy. However, 2024 data for Pool Corporation remains elusive, leaving room for speculation on its current standing. This analysis underscores the dynamic nature of the industry, where strategic financial management can lead to significant shifts in market leadership.
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: AECOM and Pool Corporation
Gross Profit Trends Compared: AECOM vs Pool Corporation
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: AECOM vs Pool Corporation
Comparative EBITDA Analysis: AECOM vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
A Side-by-Side Analysis of EBITDA: AECOM and Saia, Inc.
Comparative EBITDA Analysis: AECOM vs U-Haul Holding Company
A Professional Review of EBITDA: AECOM Compared to Curtiss-Wright Corporation
AECOM and Elbit Systems Ltd.: A Detailed Examination of EBITDA Performance
Professional EBITDA Benchmarking: AECOM vs Clean Harbors, Inc.
AECOM vs TFI International Inc.: In-Depth EBITDA Performance Comparison