R&D Insights: How Gilead Sciences, Inc. and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Allocate Funds

Biotech R&D: Gilead vs. BioCryst Spending Strategies

__timestampBioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014517960002854000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015727580003014000000
Friday, January 1, 2016610080005098000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017669620003734000000
Monday, January 1, 2018848880005018000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191070680009106000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201229640005039000000
Friday, January 1, 20212088080005363000000
Saturday, January 1, 20222532970004977000000
Sunday, January 1, 20232165660006923000000
Monday, January 1, 20245907000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

R&D Spending: A Tale of Two Biotech Giants

In the competitive world of biotechnology, research and development (R&D) spending is a key indicator of a company's commitment to innovation. Over the past decade, Gilead Sciences, Inc. and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to R&D investment. From 2014 to 2023, Gilead Sciences consistently allocated substantial resources, with an average annual R&D expenditure of approximately $5.1 billion. This represents a staggering 4,000% more than BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, which averaged around $125 million annually.

A Decade of Investment

Gilead's peak spending occurred in 2019, reaching nearly $9.1 billion, while BioCryst's highest investment was in 2022, with $253 million. Despite the disparity, both companies have shown a commitment to advancing medical science, albeit at different scales. This data highlights the diverse strategies within the biotech sector, where both large-scale and focused investments can drive innovation.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025