R&D Insights: How Incyte Corporation and Dynavax Technologies Corporation Allocate Funds

Biotech R&D: Incyte vs. Dynavax Spending Strategies

__timestampDynavax Technologies CorporationIncyte Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201484580000347523000
Thursday, January 1, 201586943000479514000
Friday, January 1, 201684493000581861000
Sunday, January 1, 2017649880001326361000
Monday, January 1, 2018749510001197957000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019623310001154111000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020286070002215942000
Friday, January 1, 2021322280001458179000
Saturday, January 1, 2022466000001585936000
Sunday, January 1, 2023548860001627594000
Monday, January 1, 20242606848000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

R&D Spending: A Tale of Two Biotech Giants

In the competitive world of biotechnology, research and development (R&D) spending is a critical indicator of a company's commitment to innovation. Over the past decade, Incyte Corporation and Dynavax Technologies Corporation have demonstrated contrasting approaches to R&D investment.

Incyte Corporation: A Steady Climb

Since 2014, Incyte has consistently increased its R&D expenses, peaking in 2020 with a staggering 2.2 billion dollars. This represents a growth of over 500% from its 2014 spending, underscoring its aggressive pursuit of new therapies.

Dynavax Technologies: A More Modest Path

Conversely, Dynavax's R&D spending has been more conservative, with a peak of approximately 87 million dollars in 2015. Despite fluctuations, its investment has remained relatively stable, reflecting a more cautious strategy.

These spending patterns highlight the diverse strategies within the biotech sector, where innovation is key to staying ahead.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025