R&D Spending Showdown: Gilead Sciences, Inc. vs Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotech R&D: Gilead vs. Sarepta's Investment Strategies

__timestampGilead Sciences, Inc.Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014285400000094231000
Thursday, January 1, 20153014000000146394000
Friday, January 1, 20165098000000188272000
Sunday, January 1, 20173734000000166707000
Monday, January 1, 20185018000000401843000
Tuesday, January 1, 20199106000000560909000
Wednesday, January 1, 20205039000000722343000
Friday, January 1, 20215363000000771182000
Saturday, January 1, 20224977000000877090000
Sunday, January 1, 20236923000000877387000
Monday, January 1, 20245907000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

R&D Spending: A Tale of Two Biotech Giants

In the competitive world of biotechnology, research and development (R&D) spending is a key indicator of a company's commitment to innovation. Over the past decade, Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to R&D investment. From 2014 to 2023, Gilead Sciences consistently outspent Sarepta, with its R&D expenses peaking at approximately $6.9 billion in 2023, a staggering 690% increase compared to Sarepta's $877 million in the same year. This trend highlights Gilead's aggressive strategy to maintain its leadership in the biotech sector. Meanwhile, Sarepta's steady increase in R&D spending, growing nearly tenfold from 2014 to 2023, underscores its commitment to innovation despite its smaller scale. This financial commitment reflects the broader industry trend where R&D investment is crucial for developing groundbreaking therapies and maintaining competitive advantage.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025