Research and Development Investment: ADMA Biologics, Inc. vs Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotech R&D: Protagonist's Aggressive Growth vs. ADMA's Conservative Approach

__timestampADMA Biologics, Inc.Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201495170147459000
Thursday, January 1, 2015701594611831000
Friday, January 1, 2016768823825705000
Sunday, January 1, 2017622958746181000
Monday, January 1, 2018392612059497000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019234384865003000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020590701374506000
Friday, January 1, 20213646060126006000
Saturday, January 1, 20223613764126215000
Sunday, January 1, 20233300000120161000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

A Decade of R&D Investment: ADMA Biologics vs. Protagonist Therapeutics

In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, research and development (R&D) investments are crucial for innovation and growth. Over the past decade, ADMA Biologics, Inc. and Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting strategies in their R&D expenditures.

Investment Trends

From 2014 to 2023, Protagonist Therapeutics has consistently outpaced ADMA Biologics in R&D spending. In 2022, Protagonist's investment peaked at approximately $126 million, marking a staggering 1,590% increase from 2014. In contrast, ADMA Biologics' R&D expenses have seen a decline, with a 65% reduction from their 2014 peak of $9.5 million to $3.3 million in 2023.

Strategic Implications

These trends highlight Protagonist's aggressive pursuit of innovation, while ADMA's more conservative approach may reflect strategic reallocations or financial constraints. As the biotech sector evolves, these investment patterns could significantly influence each company's market position and technological advancements.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025