__timestamp | Deere & Company | Snap-on Incorporated |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1452000000 | 66000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1425100000 | 49300000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1389100000 | 53400000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1367700000 | 60900000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1657600000 | 61200000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 1783000000 | 59100000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1644000000 | 57400000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1587000000 | 61100000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1912000000 | 60100000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 2177000000 | 64700000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 2290000000 | 0 |
In pursuit of knowledge
In the ever-evolving landscape of industrial innovation, research and development (R&D) investments are pivotal. Deere & Company, a titan in agricultural machinery, has consistently outpaced Snap-on Incorporated, a leader in professional tools, in R&D spending. From 2014 to 2023, Deere & Company increased its R&D investment by approximately 58%, peaking at an impressive $2.29 billion in 2024. In contrast, Snap-on's R&D expenses remained relatively stable, with a modest 9% increase over the same period, reaching $64.7 million in 2023.
This disparity highlights Deere's commitment to innovation, likely driven by the need to integrate advanced technologies into its machinery. Meanwhile, Snap-on's steady investment reflects a focus on incremental improvements. As we look to the future, the question remains: will Snap-on ramp up its R&D to compete with industry giants like Deere, or will it continue its steady path?
Breaking Down Revenue Trends: Deere & Company vs Snap-on Incorporated
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Deere & Company vs Snap-on Incorporated
Gross Profit Comparison: Deere & Company and Snap-on Incorporated Trends
Deere & Company or Carlisle Companies Incorporated: Who Invests More in Innovation?
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Deere & Company vs Snap-on Incorporated
Deere & Company and Snap-on Incorporated: A Detailed Examination of EBITDA Performance
Comparing Innovation Spending: Deere & Company and Owens Corning
Comparing Innovation Spending: Deere & Company and Avery Dennison Corporation