Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. or Travere Therapeutics, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Biotech Giants: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampRhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Travere Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014121300059644696
Thursday, January 1, 2015342500079541000
Friday, January 1, 2016631100098015000
Sunday, January 1, 20179518000103958000
Monday, January 1, 201828080000103654000
Tuesday, January 1, 201936550000128951000
Wednesday, January 1, 202046125000135799000
Friday, January 1, 202168486000149883000
Saturday, January 1, 202292032000220206000
Sunday, January 1, 2023117532000265542000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

SG&A Cost Management: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for sustaining growth and innovation. Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Travere Therapeutics, Inc. have been navigating this financial landscape since 2014. Over the past decade, Travere Therapeutics has consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately 265% more than Rhythm Pharmaceuticals in 2023. This trend suggests a more aggressive investment in administrative and sales functions. Meanwhile, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals has shown a steady increase in SG&A costs, with a notable 9-fold rise from 2014 to 2023. This indicates a strategic scaling of operations. The data highlights the contrasting approaches of these two companies in managing their operational costs, reflecting their unique business strategies and market positions.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025