Salesforce, Inc. vs Marvell Technology, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored

Salesforce vs. Marvell: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

__timestampMarvell Technology, Inc.Salesforce, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141654230000968428000
Thursday, January 1, 201518437060001289270000
Friday, January 1, 201614947360001654548000
Sunday, January 1, 201710295270002234000000
Monday, January 1, 20189472300002773000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201914073990003451000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202013422200004235000000
Friday, January 1, 202114805500005438000000
Saturday, January 1, 202223981580007026000000
Sunday, January 1, 202329321000008360000000
Monday, January 1, 202432141000008541000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Unveiling Cost Efficiency: Salesforce vs. Marvell Technology

In the ever-evolving tech industry, cost efficiency is a critical metric for success. Over the past decade, Salesforce, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting trends in their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2024, Salesforce's cost of revenue surged by approximately 782%, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy. In contrast, Marvell Technology's cost of revenue increased by about 94%, indicating a more measured expansion.

A Decade of Financial Dynamics

Salesforce's cost of revenue, which started at around $968 million in 2014, reached a peak of $8.54 billion by 2024. This growth underscores Salesforce's commitment to scaling its operations and expanding its market reach. Meanwhile, Marvell Technology's cost of revenue rose from $1.65 billion in 2014 to $3.21 billion in 2024, highlighting its focus on maintaining a balanced growth trajectory. These figures reveal the strategic priorities of each company, offering valuable insights into their operational efficiencies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025