SAP SE or Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SAP vs. Monolithic Power: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampMonolithic Power Systems, Inc.SAP SE
Wednesday, January 1, 2014667550005195000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015723120006449000000
Friday, January 1, 2016830120007299000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017972570007999000000
Monday, January 1, 20181138030007879000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191335420009318000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201616700008461000000
Friday, January 1, 20212261900009936000000
Saturday, January 1, 202227359500011015000000
Sunday, January 1, 202327574000010192000000
Monday, January 1, 202410254000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Managing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of global business, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. SAP SE, a German multinational software corporation, and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc., a leading semiconductor company, offer a fascinating study in contrasts. Over the past decade, SAP SE's SG&A expenses have consistently been around 30 times higher than those of Monolithic Power Systems. However, Monolithic Power Systems has shown a remarkable growth trajectory, with its SG&A costs increasing by over 300% from 2014 to 2023. In contrast, SAP SE's expenses grew by approximately 88% during the same period. This data highlights the different scales and growth strategies of these companies. While SAP SE operates on a larger scale, Monolithic Power Systems is rapidly expanding, reflecting its dynamic approach in the tech industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025