Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated vs PTC Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotech Giants' SG&A Spending: A Decade of Strategic Choices

__timestampCorcept Therapeutics IncorporatedPTC Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20143491600044820000
Thursday, January 1, 20153694900082080000
Friday, January 1, 20164524000097130000
Sunday, January 1, 201762416000121271000
Monday, January 1, 201881289000153548000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019100359000202541000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020105326000245164000
Friday, January 1, 2021122356000285773000
Saturday, January 1, 2022152848000325998000
Sunday, January 1, 2023184259000332540000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

A Tale of Two Therapeutics: SG&A Expenses Over Time

In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, managing operational costs is crucial. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated and PTC Therapeutics, Inc. from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, PTC Therapeutics consistently outpaced Corcept in SG&A spending, with a notable increase of approximately 640% from 2014 to 2023. In contrast, Corcept's expenses grew by around 430% during the same timeframe. This disparity highlights PTC's aggressive investment in administrative and sales functions, potentially reflecting a strategy focused on rapid expansion and market penetration. Meanwhile, Corcept's more conservative growth in SG&A expenses may indicate a focus on efficiency and cost management. As both companies navigate the evolving biotech sector, their differing approaches to SG&A spending offer insights into their strategic priorities and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025