Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Eli Lilly and Company vs Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.

SG&A Expenses: Eli Lilly vs. Walgreens Boots Alliance

__timestampEli Lilly and CompanyWalgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014662080000017992000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015653300000022400000000
Friday, January 1, 2016645200000023910000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017658810000023813000000
Monday, January 1, 2018597510000024694000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019621380000023557000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020612120000025436000000
Friday, January 1, 2021643160000024586000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022644040000027295000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023694120000034205000000
Monday, January 1, 2024859380000028113000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

A Comparative Analysis of SG&A Expenses: Eli Lilly vs. Walgreens Boots Alliance

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding the nuances of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. Over the past decade, Eli Lilly and Company and Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. have showcased distinct financial trajectories in this domain. From 2014 to 2023, Eli Lilly's SG&A expenses have seen a modest increase of approximately 5%, peaking at $6.94 billion in 2023. In contrast, Walgreens Boots Alliance has experienced a more pronounced growth of around 44%, reaching $25.48 billion in the same year. This disparity highlights the differing strategic priorities and operational scales of these two industry giants. Notably, the data for 2024 is incomplete for Eli Lilly, indicating potential shifts or reporting delays. As these companies continue to navigate the complexities of the healthcare and retail sectors, their SG&A trends offer valuable insights into their operational efficiencies and market strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025