__timestamp | Comfort Systems USA, Inc. | Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 207652000 | 38125000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 228965000 | 41990000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 243201000 | 41763000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 266586000 | 44290000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 296986000 | 45346000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 340005000 | 44002000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 357777000 | 18436000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 376309000 | 16026000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 489344000 | 24293000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 536188999 | 27913000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 33331000 |
Unleashing insights
In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding the nuances of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. Over the past decade, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. has seen a remarkable 158% increase in SG&A expenses, growing from approximately $208 million in 2014 to $536 million in 2023. This growth reflects the company's strategic investments in operational efficiency and market expansion.
Conversely, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. experienced a more modest fluctuation, with SG&A expenses peaking at around $45 million in 2018 before declining to $28 million in 2023. This 38% decrease suggests a focus on cost optimization and streamlined operations.
These trends highlight the contrasting financial strategies of two industry leaders, offering valuable insights into their operational priorities and market positioning. As businesses navigate the complexities of the modern economy, such analyses provide a window into the strategic decisions shaping their futures.
Breaking Down Revenue Trends: Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. vs Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
Cost of Revenue Trends: Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. vs Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. and ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. and Graco Inc.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. and CNH Industrial N.V.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. or AECOM: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. vs Pool Corporation
A Side-by-Side Analysis of EBITDA: Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. and Comfort Systems USA, Inc.