SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing AbbVie Inc. and CRISPR Therapeutics AG

Biotech Giants' SG&A Strategies: AbbVie vs. CRISPR

__timestampAbbVie Inc.CRISPR Therapeutics AG
Wednesday, January 1, 201477240000005114000
Thursday, January 1, 2015638700000013403000
Friday, January 1, 2016585500000031056000
Sunday, January 1, 2017627500000035845000
Monday, January 1, 2018739900000048294000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019694200000063488000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201129900000088208000
Friday, January 1, 202112349000000102802000
Saturday, January 1, 202215260000000102464000
Sunday, January 1, 20231287200000076162000
Monday, January 1, 20241475200000072977000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Biotech Giants

In the ever-evolving biotech landscape, understanding operational efficiency is crucial. AbbVie Inc. and CRISPR Therapeutics AG, two titans in the industry, showcase contrasting approaches to managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, AbbVie consistently demonstrated a robust SG&A strategy, with expenses peaking at approximately $15.3 billion in 2022, reflecting a 98% increase from 2016. In contrast, CRISPR Therapeutics AG, a pioneer in gene editing, maintained a leaner approach, with expenses reaching around $102 million in 2021, marking a 20-fold increase since 2014. This disparity highlights AbbVie's expansive operational scale compared to CRISPR's focused innovation-driven model. As the biotech sector continues to grow, these insights into SG&A efficiency offer valuable lessons for emerging companies aiming to balance growth with cost management.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025