SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Galapagos NV

Biotech Giants: ACADIA vs. Galapagos SG&A Strategies

__timestampACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.Galapagos NV
Wednesday, January 1, 2014327480009079000
Thursday, January 1, 20159080400020309000
Friday, January 1, 201618645600016945000
Sunday, January 1, 201725506200020559000
Monday, January 1, 201826575800029641000
Tuesday, January 1, 201932563800088258000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020388661000162170000
Friday, January 1, 2021396028000167218000
Saturday, January 1, 2022369090000239528000
Sunday, January 1, 202340246600094252000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing operational expenses is crucial for success. Over the past decade, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Galapagos NV have demonstrated contrasting strategies in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, ACADIA's SG&A expenses surged by over 1,100%, peaking in 2023, reflecting their aggressive expansion and market penetration efforts. In contrast, Galapagos NV maintained a more conservative approach, with a modest increase of around 940% over the same period. This divergence highlights ACADIA's focus on rapid growth, while Galapagos NV appears to prioritize steady, sustainable development. As investors and industry analysts evaluate these companies, understanding their SG&A efficiency provides valuable insights into their strategic priorities and potential future performance.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025