SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Arista Networks, Inc. and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

SG&A Efficiency: Arista vs. Monolithic Power

__timestampArista Networks, Inc.Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201411766900066755000
Thursday, January 1, 201518480400072312000
Friday, January 1, 201620612600083012000
Sunday, January 1, 201724190300097257000
Monday, January 1, 2018252562000113803000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019275805000133542000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020295608000161670000
Friday, January 1, 2021369288000226190000
Saturday, January 1, 2022420196000273595000
Sunday, January 1, 2023518114000275740000
Monday, January 1, 2024549970000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Innovators

In the dynamic world of technology, operational efficiency is paramount. Arista Networks, Inc. and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. have demonstrated distinct trajectories in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses from 2014 to 2023. Arista Networks has seen a remarkable increase, with expenses growing by approximately 340% over this period. In contrast, Monolithic Power Systems experienced a more moderate rise of around 310%.

A Decade of Growth

Starting in 2014, Arista Networks' SG&A expenses were nearly double those of Monolithic Power Systems. By 2023, this gap widened, with Arista's expenses reaching nearly twice the amount of Monolithic's. This trend reflects Arista's aggressive expansion and investment in operational capabilities. Meanwhile, Monolithic Power Systems has maintained a steady growth trajectory, focusing on sustainable scaling.

Strategic Implications

These trends highlight the strategic choices of each company. Arista's higher SG&A expenses suggest a focus on rapid growth and market penetration, while Monolithic's approach indicates a balanced strategy prioritizing efficiency and long-term sustainability.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025