SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. and Veracyte, Inc.

Biotech SG&A: Axsome vs. Veracyte's Strategic Spending

__timestampAxsome Therapeutics, Inc.Veracyte, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014139283040786000
Thursday, January 1, 2015241928947876000
Friday, January 1, 2016634364852035000
Sunday, January 1, 2017720669155348000
Monday, January 1, 2018935152265276000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191359803082720000
Wednesday, January 1, 20202889674989118000
Friday, January 1, 202166646205181193000
Saturday, January 1, 2022159253661174078000
Sunday, January 1, 2023323123000184232000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the dynamic world of biotechnology, understanding a company's operational efficiency is crucial. Over the past decade, Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. and Veracyte, Inc. have showcased contrasting trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Axsome's SG&A expenses skyrocketed by over 23,000%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and investment in growth. In contrast, Veracyte's expenses grew by approximately 350%, indicating a more measured approach.

Key Insights

  • Axsome Therapeutics: Starting with modest expenses in 2014, Axsome's SG&A costs surged, peaking in 2023. This growth underscores its strategic focus on scaling operations and market presence.
  • Veracyte, Inc.: While Veracyte's expenses also increased, the growth was steadier, suggesting a balanced strategy between expansion and cost management.

These trends highlight the diverse strategies employed by biotech firms in navigating the competitive landscape.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025