SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Celldex Therapeutics, Inc.

SG&A Efficiency: Bristol-Myers Squibb vs. Celldex

__timestampBristol-Myers Squibb CompanyCelldex Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014569900000020622000
Thursday, January 1, 2015500100000033837000
Friday, January 1, 2016500200000035979000
Sunday, January 1, 2017484900000025003000
Monday, January 1, 2018455100000019269000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019487100000015426000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020766100000014456000
Friday, January 1, 2021769000000020488000
Saturday, January 1, 2022781400000027195000
Sunday, January 1, 2023777200000030914000
Monday, January 1, 20248414000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, understanding the efficiency of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) and Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. (CLDX) offer a fascinating comparison over the past decade.

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company

From 2014 to 2023, BMY's SG&A expenses have shown a significant upward trend, peaking in 2022 with a 37% increase from 2014. This reflects the company's strategic investments in marketing and administration to maintain its market position.

Celldex Therapeutics, Inc.

In contrast, CLDX's SG&A expenses have remained relatively stable, with a modest 50% increase over the same period. This stability suggests a more conservative approach to administrative spending, possibly due to its smaller market footprint.

This analysis highlights the diverse strategies employed by pharmaceutical companies in managing operational costs, offering insights into their financial health and market strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025