SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing ImmunityBio, Inc. and Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

SG&A Efficiency: ImmunityBio vs. Supernus Pharmaceuticals

__timestampImmunityBio, Inc.Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014432600072471000
Thursday, January 1, 201522620600089204000
Friday, January 1, 201694391000106010000
Sunday, January 1, 201753821000137905000
Monday, January 1, 201835463000159888000
Tuesday, January 1, 201946456000158425000
Wednesday, January 1, 202071318000200677000
Friday, January 1, 2021135256000304759000
Saturday, January 1, 2022102708000377221000
Sunday, January 1, 2023129620000336361000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Biopharma Companies

In the competitive landscape of biopharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Over the past decade, ImmunityBio, Inc. and Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain. From 2014 to 2023, ImmunityBio's SG&A expenses surged by approximately 2,900%, peaking in 2015, while Supernus Pharmaceuticals maintained a steadier growth, with a 365% increase over the same period. This disparity highlights ImmunityBio's aggressive expansion strategy compared to Supernus's more measured approach. Notably, in 2022, Supernus's SG&A expenses were nearly three times higher than ImmunityBio's, reflecting its larger market footprint. As these companies navigate the evolving healthcare landscape, their SG&A efficiency will remain a key indicator of their operational success and market adaptability.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025