SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biopharma SG&A Trends: Intra-Cellular vs. Rhythm

__timestampIntra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014103376791213000
Thursday, January 1, 2015181872863425000
Friday, January 1, 2016247580636311000
Sunday, January 1, 2017236669579518000
Monday, January 1, 20183009985528080000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196494762536550000
Wednesday, January 1, 202018636344446125000
Friday, January 1, 202127261104068486000
Saturday, January 1, 202235878200092032000
Sunday, January 1, 2023409864000117532000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Biopharma Companies

In the competitive world of biopharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Over the past decade, Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have shown distinct trajectories in their SG&A spending. From 2014 to 2023, Intra-Cellular Therapies saw a staggering increase of nearly 3,900% in SG&A expenses, reflecting their aggressive growth and expansion strategies. In contrast, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals experienced a more moderate rise of approximately 9,600%, indicating a steady scaling of operations.

By 2023, Intra-Cellular Therapies' SG&A expenses were nearly 3.5 times higher than Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, highlighting their larger operational scale. This analysis provides a window into how these companies allocate resources to support their growth ambitions, offering valuable insights for investors and industry analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025