SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Johnson & Johnson and ADMA Biologics, Inc.

SG&A Trends: Johnson & Johnson vs. ADMA Biologics

__timestampADMA Biologics, Inc.Johnson & Johnson
Wednesday, January 1, 2014482386921954000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015674596821203000000
Friday, January 1, 2016849474219945000000
Sunday, January 1, 20171809283521420000000
Monday, January 1, 20182250292222540000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192591075722178000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203505081722084000000
Friday, January 1, 20214289688920118000000
Saturday, January 1, 20225245802419046000000
Sunday, January 1, 20235902000020112000000
Monday, January 1, 202421969000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, understanding the efficiency of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. Over the past decade, Johnson & Johnson and ADMA Biologics, Inc. have showcased contrasting trends in their SG&A expenditures.

Johnson & Johnson: A Steady Giant

From 2014 to 2023, Johnson & Johnson maintained a robust SG&A expense, averaging around $21 billion annually. Despite minor fluctuations, their expenses remained relatively stable, reflecting a consistent operational strategy.

ADMA Biologics: A Rapid Climber

Conversely, ADMA Biologics experienced a dramatic increase in SG&A expenses, surging from approximately $4.8 million in 2014 to nearly $59 million in 2023. This represents a staggering growth of over 1,100%, highlighting their aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities.

These insights underscore the diverse strategies employed by industry leaders and emerging players in managing operational costs.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025