SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Lam Research Corporation and Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.

SG&A Trends: Lam Research vs. Check Point

__timestampCheck Point Software Technologies Ltd.Lam Research Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014384921000613341000
Thursday, January 1, 2015451785000591611000
Friday, January 1, 2016508656000630954000
Sunday, January 1, 2017525392000667485000
Monday, January 1, 2018589799000762219000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019658400000702407000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020681400000682479000
Friday, January 1, 2021708500000829875000
Saturday, January 1, 2022791300000885737000
Sunday, January 1, 2023864100000832753000
Monday, January 1, 2024868247000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Tech Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding a company's operational efficiency is crucial. Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses offer a window into this efficiency. Over the past decade, Lam Research Corporation and Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. have showcased distinct trends in their SG&A expenditures.

From 2014 to 2023, Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. saw a steady increase in SG&A expenses, rising approximately 124% from 2014 to 2023. This growth reflects their strategic investments in marketing and administration to bolster their cybersecurity offerings. Meanwhile, Lam Research Corporation experienced a more moderate increase of around 36% over the same period, indicating a focus on maintaining operational efficiency while expanding their semiconductor solutions.

Interestingly, 2024 data for Check Point is missing, leaving room for speculation on their future strategies. As these companies navigate the competitive tech landscape, their SG&A trends provide valuable insights into their strategic priorities.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025