__timestamp | Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Novartis AG |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 24419536 | 14993000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 34718089 | 14247000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 40998209 | 14192000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 32022880 | 14997000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 19110051 | 16471000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 26556257 | 14369000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 52275890 | 14197000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 80981000 | 14886000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 124431000 | 14253000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 90932000 | 12489000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 98761000 | 12566000000 |
Infusing magic into the data realm
In the world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Novartis AG and Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have showcased contrasting approaches to SG&A efficiency.
From 2014 to 2023, Novartis AG consistently maintained its SG&A expenses around $14 billion annually, reflecting a stable strategy in managing operational costs. This consistency highlights Novartis's robust financial management, ensuring that its vast resources are effectively utilized to support its global operations.
In contrast, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals experienced a significant increase in SG&A expenses, growing by approximately 300% from 2014 to 2023. This surge indicates Arrowhead's aggressive expansion and investment in its administrative capabilities, aligning with its growth trajectory in the biotech sector.
While Novartis's approach underscores stability, Arrowhead's strategy reflects dynamic growth, each tailored to their unique market positions.
Novartis AG and Sanofi: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Novartis AG vs Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Novartis AG vs Gilead Sciences, Inc. Trends and Insights
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Novartis AG vs Cytokinetics, Incorporated Trends and Insights
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Novartis AG and Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Genmab A/S vs Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Trends and Insights
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. and Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Alkermes plc vs Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Trends and Insights
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. vs Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Mesoblast Limited
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. vs Celldex Therapeutics, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Evotec SE