SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Novartis AG and Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

SG&A Efficiency: Novartis vs. Arrowhead's Strategic Approaches

__timestampArrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Novartis AG
Wednesday, January 1, 20142441953614993000000
Thursday, January 1, 20153471808914247000000
Friday, January 1, 20164099820914192000000
Sunday, January 1, 20173202288014997000000
Monday, January 1, 20181911005116471000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192655625714369000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20205227589014197000000
Friday, January 1, 20218098100014886000000
Saturday, January 1, 202212443100014253000000
Sunday, January 1, 20239093200012489000000
Monday, January 1, 20249876100012566000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Companies

In the world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Novartis AG and Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have showcased contrasting approaches to SG&A efficiency.

Novartis AG: A Giant's Steady Course

From 2014 to 2023, Novartis AG consistently maintained its SG&A expenses around $14 billion annually, reflecting a stable strategy in managing operational costs. This consistency highlights Novartis's robust financial management, ensuring that its vast resources are effectively utilized to support its global operations.

Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals: A Dynamic Growth

In contrast, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals experienced a significant increase in SG&A expenses, growing by approximately 300% from 2014 to 2023. This surge indicates Arrowhead's aggressive expansion and investment in its administrative capabilities, aligning with its growth trajectory in the biotech sector.

Conclusion

While Novartis's approach underscores stability, Arrowhead's strategy reflects dynamic growth, each tailored to their unique market positions.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025