SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Opthea Limited and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotech SG&A: Opthea vs. BioCryst Efficiency

__timestampBioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Opthea Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 201474610002652041
Thursday, January 1, 2015130470002361587
Friday, January 1, 2016112530004472869
Sunday, January 1, 2017139330005030957
Monday, January 1, 2018295140004988941
Tuesday, January 1, 2019371210005196412
Wednesday, January 1, 2020679290006652774
Friday, January 1, 202111881800018418247
Saturday, January 1, 202215937100024827066
Sunday, January 1, 202321389400041896408
Monday, January 1, 202415488619
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Biotech Companies

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing operational costs is crucial for success. This analysis compares the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of Opthea Limited and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. over a decade, from 2014 to 2023.

BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

BioCryst Pharmaceuticals has seen a significant increase in SG&A expenses, growing by approximately 2,770% from 2014 to 2023. This surge reflects the company's aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities. However, such a steep rise in expenses could impact profitability if not matched by revenue growth.

Opthea Limited

Opthea Limited, on the other hand, has maintained a more conservative growth in SG&A expenses, with a 1,480% increase over the same period. This suggests a more measured approach to scaling operations, potentially positioning the company for sustainable growth.

The data for 2024 is incomplete, indicating a need for further analysis to understand future trends.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025