SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Viking Therapeutics, Inc. and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotech SG&A Efficiency: Viking vs. BioCryst

__timestampBioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Viking Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201474610001244910
Thursday, January 1, 2015130470005029636
Friday, January 1, 2016112530004846776
Sunday, January 1, 2017139330005329003
Monday, January 1, 2018295140007121000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019371210009128000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206792900010731000
Friday, January 1, 202111881800010701000
Saturday, January 1, 202215937100016121000
Sunday, January 1, 202321389400037021000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing operational costs is crucial for success. This analysis compares the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of Viking Therapeutics, Inc. and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals saw a staggering 2,765% increase in SG&A expenses, peaking at $213.9 million in 2023. In contrast, Viking Therapeutics experienced a more modest rise of 2,872%, reaching $37 million in the same year.

Key Insights

BioCryst's expenses surged significantly post-2020, reflecting strategic investments or expansions. Meanwhile, Viking's steady growth suggests a more controlled approach to scaling operations. Understanding these trends can offer investors insights into each company's operational strategies and financial health. As the biotech industry continues to evolve, monitoring SG&A efficiency remains a vital metric for assessing corporate performance.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025