Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

SG&A Spending: Stanley Black & Decker vs. C.H. Robinson

__timestampC.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20143202130002595900000
Thursday, January 1, 20153587600002486400000
Friday, January 1, 20163750610002623900000
Sunday, January 1, 20174134040002980100000
Monday, January 1, 20184496100003171700000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194978060003041000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20204961220003089600000
Friday, January 1, 20215263710003240400000
Saturday, January 1, 20226034150003370000000
Sunday, January 1, 20236242660002829300000
Monday, January 1, 20246396240003310500000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

SG&A Spending Patterns: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding the spending patterns of industry leaders can offer valuable insights. Over the past decade, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. have demonstrated distinct trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Stanley Black & Decker's SG&A expenses have shown a steady increase, peaking in 2022 with a 30% rise from 2014. However, 2023 saw a notable dip, indicating potential strategic shifts or market challenges.

Conversely, C.H. Robinson Worldwide has consistently increased its SG&A spending, with a remarkable 100% growth from 2014 to 2024. This upward trajectory suggests a robust investment in operational capabilities and market expansion. The data for 2024 is incomplete for Stanley Black & Decker, highlighting the need for cautious interpretation. These patterns underscore the dynamic nature of corporate strategies in response to market demands.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025