Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and Curtiss-Wright Corporation: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

SG&A Spending: Stanley Black & Decker vs. Curtiss-Wright

__timestampCurtiss-Wright CorporationStanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20144263010002595900000
Thursday, January 1, 20154118010002486400000
Friday, January 1, 20163837930002623900000
Sunday, January 1, 20174185440002980100000
Monday, January 1, 20184331100003171700000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194222720003041000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20204128250003089600000
Friday, January 1, 20214430960003240400000
Saturday, January 1, 20224456790003370000000
Sunday, January 1, 20234968120002829300000
Monday, January 1, 20245188570003310500000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

SG&A Spending Patterns: A Tale of Two Corporations

In the world of industrial giants, understanding spending patterns can reveal much about a company's strategic priorities. Over the past decade, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and Curtiss-Wright Corporation have showcased distinct approaches in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Stanley Black & Decker's SG&A expenses have consistently been about seven times higher than those of Curtiss-Wright, peaking in 2022 with a 30% increase from 2014. Meanwhile, Curtiss-Wright's spending has shown a steady rise, culminating in a 16% increase over the same period. This divergence highlights Stanley Black & Decker's aggressive market strategies compared to Curtiss-Wright's more conservative approach. As we move forward, these patterns may offer insights into each company's future growth and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025