Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited or Alkermes plc: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Teva vs. Alkermes: A Decade of SG&A Cost Management

__timestampAlkermes plcTeva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 20141999050005078000000
Thursday, January 1, 20153115580004717000000
Friday, January 1, 20163741300005096000000
Sunday, January 1, 20174215780004986000000
Monday, January 1, 20185264080004214000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20195994490003806000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20205388270003671000000
Friday, January 1, 20215609770003528000000
Saturday, January 1, 20226057470003445000000
Sunday, January 1, 20236897510003498000000
Monday, January 1, 20246452380003702000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Managing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Pharmaceutical Giants

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited and Alkermes plc have shown contrasting approaches to handling these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Alkermes plc has demonstrated a steady increase in SG&A expenses, rising by approximately 245%, from $200 million to nearly $690 million. This growth reflects their strategic investments in marketing and administration to bolster their market presence.

Conversely, Teva has managed to reduce its SG&A expenses by about 31%, from $5.08 billion in 2014 to $3.50 billion in 2023. This significant reduction highlights Teva's focus on cost efficiency and operational optimization. As these two companies continue to navigate the pharmaceutical landscape, their differing strategies in managing SG&A costs offer valuable insights into their long-term business models.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025